<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [RFC] Cat: A Typed Functional Stack Based Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cdiggins.com/2007/01/31/rfc-cat-a-typed-functional-stack-based-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cdiggins.com/2007/01/31/rfc-cat-a-typed-functional-stack-based-language/</link>
	<description>Christopher Diggins</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: robbert van dalen</title>
		<link>http://cdiggins.com/2007/01/31/rfc-cat-a-typed-functional-stack-based-language/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>robbert van dalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cdiggins.com/2007/01/31/rfc-cat-a-typed-functional-stack-based-language/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I think your paper is fabulous and will give the Haskell community something to think about.

Although I'm not in the strong typing camp,  I do see the need for a typed purelely functional stack language.

Anyway, your work and writings on Cat is certainly promoting concatenative languages on a whole and make them more accessible to the mainstream or functional purist otherwise.

I guess that if you can make Cat really efficient (as you claim), I might consider implementing Enchilada on top of Cat.

But if you don't then I would have to consider Factor :)

I'll be watching your blog closely.

- Robbert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your paper is fabulous and will give the Haskell community something to think about.</p>
<p>Although I&#8217;m not in the strong typing camp,  I do see the need for a typed purelely functional stack language.</p>
<p>Anyway, your work and writings on Cat is certainly promoting concatenative languages on a whole and make them more accessible to the mainstream or functional purist otherwise.</p>
<p>I guess that if you can make Cat really efficient (as you claim), I might consider implementing Enchilada on top of Cat.</p>
<p>But if you don&#8217;t then I would have to consider Factor :)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be watching your blog closely.</p>
<p>- Robbert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
